![]() ![]() The result is a claimed increase in calibration accuracy, especially in the lightest and darkest image regions, and a sub-2-minute calibration time, making this the fastest Spyder calibrator ever. It uses a brand new lens-based sensor system rather than the old honeycomb baffle on the Spyder5. If you really want to enjoy best possible image quality with SD, I would say external (high end) monitor is the only way to go, spending time tweaking the low gamut LCD on the SD (AFAIK that is less than 70% sRGB gamut coverage) just won't do you much good IMHO.SpyderX is the successor to Datacolor’s popular Spyder5 monitor calibrator series. ![]() You may or may not aware, human eyes do adjust themselves to color temperature, so that won't matter a lot for people not performing color critical task on even if it is a little off, on the other hand the color banding caused by software calibration will just stay and bothers you, especially if you really cares about the image quality and have good eyes. ![]() On the other hand, cheaper monitors that are not built with color management in mind, while they could still "adjust" the color, those are usually performed by modifying the signal sent to the GPU and subsequently the monitor, you could get more accurate white point temperature and gamma (usually 6500K, 2.2 for typical sRGB standard), at the cost of color banding, the tradeoff can have significant negative impact to the image quality as the display of SD is not a 10bit one, but only 8bit (or most likely a 6bit + FRC) without internal LUT, performing software calibration on these low quality monitors could HURTS the objective image quality a lot. Let's say it this way, if you have invest some time in the color management, you should know professional monitors for color management workflow like Eizo's ColorEdge lineup, does utilize high precision LUT (Look-Up-Table) SoC in their premium monitors (CGXXX or CGXXXX), which allow adjustment of signal in the monitor, when measurements are taken from colorimeter or spectrophotometer, the appropriate adjustment offsets are calculated by the internal LUT of the monitor, the PC could send the bit-perfect color signal to GPU without being modified (preserving full 8 or 10 bit resolution per RGB channel), which is known as hardware calibration. I am not an expert in color management industry, just a hobbyist, but I doubt much could be done to the objective image quality with the control we have over the SD hardware. Holy crap this is a terrible take.ġ) Every display should be calibrated, OLED, IPS, TN, CRT, etc.Ģ) The Steam Deck screen is IPS, but it is NOT a good screen and could probably really benefit from a calibration. I know this is a little old, but I came across this while researching calibrating my Steam Deck. Calibration are for bad/cheap TN panels, and for old panels witch loses colors/brightness over time. When calibrated, use it's profile from monitor color options and it should used every time by default.Īnyway Steam Deck have IPS panel and calibration already a good panel will not make it better. Just install Displa圜al and use any compatible colorimether. Originally posted by THE DEATH:You can use colorimether ofcource. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |